Article 129 of the Constitution of India says that the Supreme Court Shall be a a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.
According to article 215 of the Constitution of India, every High Court Shall be court of record and shall I have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.
Parliament and the State Legislature both have power to make laws with respect to any of the subject enumerated in list III( concurrent list ) of the seventh schedule of the Constitution. The parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters are subjects enumerated in list -I (Union list) of the 7th of the Constitution.
The state legislature has exclusive power to make laws with respect of any of the matter or subjects enumerated in list II(State list) of the seventh scheduled of the Constitution .
Entry 77 of the list is as follows-
Constitution , organization, jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court (including contempt for such a court ) and the fees taken therein; persons entitled to practise before the supreme Court.
Constitution , organization, jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court (including contempt for such a court ) and the fees taken therein; persons entitled to practise before the supreme Court.
Entry15 of list II is as follows " contempt of court but not including contempt of Supreme Court " .
The legislature is fully competent to legislate with respect to competent of court subject only to the qualification that the legislature cannot take away the power of the Supreme Court or the High Court to punish for contempt or vest that power in some other court.
Article 142(2) of the Constitution of India states that the Supreme Court shall have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any document, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself .
According to article 372 of Constitution of India, all the laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall continue in force therein until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority. That is why section 22 of the competent of Courts Act 1971, it makes it clear that the provision of this Act shall be in Addison to and not in derogation of the provision of any other law relating to contempt of courts.
The contempt of Courts Act is not violation of guarantee of equality and article 14 as the classification of a founded on the intelligible differentia which distinguisher persons or things that are grouped together from other left out of the group and the differentia has a rational relation to the object thought to be achieved by the statute in question is reasonable.
As the existing law relating to contempt of court imposes reasonable restrictions within the meaning of article 19(2) and therefore, it is not violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression guarantee by article 19 (1)(2) of the Constitution.
According to clause 10 of the article 366 the existing law means any law ordinance order bye- law , rule or regulation passed or made before the commencement of this Constitution by a legislature, authority or person having power to make such a law., ordinance bye-law , rule or regulation.
The contempt of law is not violative of article 21 which provides that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law as the existing procedure for contempt proceedings have statutory sanction. Section 10 of the contempt Act,1971, makes it clear that every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction powers and authority in accordance with the same procedure and practice in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercise in respect of contempts of itself. beside this article 225 of the Constitution of India makes provision for its continuity.
Hence on the above grounds, it can be concluded that the contempt of court at 1971 is not violative of any provision of the Constitution and it is constitutionally valid
good keep try... you may also add to Article 14 with Contempt of Court
ReplyDeleteMost of the information mention aforesaid is wrong , regarding the constitutional validity of contempt of court
ReplyDeleteIn sch 7 - list 1 (union list ) entry no, 77
and list 3 (concurrent list ) entry no, 14
these above two entry deals with relevant topic and not the entries who had mentioned
ReplyDeleteCriminal resistance administration offers lawful portrayal to people under police examination or dealing with criminal indictments. slip and fall injury lawyer
For a long time me & my friend were searching for informative blogs, but now I am on the right place guys, you have made a room in my heart! Personal injury lawsuit
ReplyDeleteIn the event that you are not ready to pay for a lawyer upon the season of your capture, you will be designated one through the state who will represent you at your underlying arraignment. check here
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day they would almost certainly give to you the damage rules that everyone must follow and offer the most ideal counsel.go here
ReplyDeleteAmazing, this is great as you want to learn more, I invite to This is my page. check over here
ReplyDeleteSurely, you can draft contracts on your own, you can survive gruesome negotiations with your business clients, you can settle a marital dispute among yourselves but when the need to come to court arises, you need to get a lawyer. https://dr-goz-peter-ugyved.business.site/
ReplyDeleteThe principle of lis pendens looks to help the object of the drafters of the Brussels Regulation which is to advance trust in the inward market, to diminish variations between public laws on the jurisdictional front; and to fortify the conviction of people domiciled in the part states under the present jurisdictional set-up, in order to defend their lawful and enormous money related interests and this thus prompts the formation of lawful sureness which view or perception is upheld by a few conveyors of insight in the concerned field of study.Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer
ReplyDeleteJust as there are varied disciplines in the field of medicine, there is a wide range of divisions when it comes to law. For instance, everyone knows that you don't visit a general physician for a severe heart ailment. https://baylegal.com/
ReplyDeleteDivorce can be a difficult as well as psychologically tolling process on all parties involved. David Karp
ReplyDeleteI admire this article for the well-researched content and excellent blog. Hire the professional and experienced miami business lawyer who resolve your issue as soon as possible.lawyer in Abu Dhabi
ReplyDeleteVery interesting. Your article is so convincing that I can never stop myself from saying anything about it. You are doing a great job, thanks for sharing such a great blog.lawyer in Dubai
ReplyDeleteYour vision or thought on marketing really helpful for me but it's too old I always prefer new thought and updated thought. https://www.healthkartclub.com/testogen-review/
ReplyDeleteBIGGER IS BETTER HYPE When it comes to law firms, bigger is not necessarily better, much less the best. If you want personal attention, you may find that a medium sized or smaller firm will be more attentive. https://www.bestdivorcelawyerdelhi.in/
ReplyDeleteIn the event that you are not ready to pay for a lawyer upon the season of your capture, you will be designated one through the state who will represent you at your underlying arraignment.Advogados Portimao
ReplyDeleteto diminish variations between public laws on the jurisdictional front; and to fortify the conviction of people domiciled in the part states under the present jurisdictional set-up, in order to defend their lawful and enormous money related interests and this thus prompts the formation of lawful sureness which view or perception is upheld by a few conveyors of insight in the concerned field of study.บาคาร่าออนไลน์
ReplyDeleteThank you for letting me read the wonderful stories. I have one to tell.
ReplyDeleteMany years ago after I lost my husband, had his brother staying for a few days. I went shopping relies I was short of $100. Found out my brother in law took my card and put it back. He stole from me and his nephews.บาคาร่าออนไลน์
One of the fundamental principles of law is the notion of equality before it. Legal systems strive to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their background, social status, or wealth, are subject to the same set of rules and are entitled to equal protection under the law. This principle is essential in promoting fairness and preventing discrimination within societies.Đăng ký kinh doanh
ReplyDelete