Distinction
between False imprisonment and Malicious prosecution
No.
|
False
imprisonment
|
Malicious prosecution
|
1)
|
It is not
necessary to prove malice.
|
It is necessary to
prove malice.
|
2)
|
It is not
necessary to absence of a reasonable or probable cause.
|
It must be proved
that the Criminal Proceedings were made without reasonable and probable
cause.
|
3)
|
Mistake of fact
would not be a good defense.
|
Mistake may be a good
defense
|
4)
|
It is a tort
against liberty of movement.
|
It is a tort
against right not to be harassed by prosecution.
|
5)
|
Actual damage
need not be proved. It is actionable per se.
|
Actual damage has
to be proved. It is not actionable per se.
|
Very useful informations.
ReplyDeleteThank you for providing us with Very useful information. I'm happy to have learned something new today about prosecutor vs lawyer.
ReplyDelete