Difference / Distinction between Condition Precedent and Condition Subsequent
No.
|
Condition Precedent
|
Condition Subsequent
|
1)
|
A condition precedent is one the fulfillment of which completes an inchoate title.
|
A condition subsequent is one of the fulfillment of which extinguishes a title already completed.
|
2)
|
A condition precedent always comes before the creation of an interest.
|
A condition subsequent always follows the vesting of an interest which is already complete.
|
3)
|
In the case of Condition precedent, the vesting of the estate is postponed till the performance of the condition precedent.
|
In the case of condition subsequent, vesting is complete and not postponed.
|
4)
|
In the case of condition precedent, an interest once vested can never be divested by reason of non-fulfillment of the condition.
|
In the case of condition subsequent, interest, even though vested, is liable to be divested by reason of the non-fulfillment of the condition.
|
5)
|
In the case of condition precedent, an estate is not in the grantee until the condition precedent is performed.
|
In the case of condition subsequent, the estate immediately vests in the grantee and remains in him till the condition is broken.
|
6)
|
In the case of condition precedent, transfer will be void if the condition precedent is impossible to performance, or immoral or opposed to public policy.
|
In the case of condition subsequent , the transfer becomes absolute and the condition will be ignored if that condition is impossible of performance or immoral or against to public policy.
|
7)
|
In the case of condition precedent, the condition precedent must be valid in law.
|
In the case of condition subsequent, it need not be so and the invalidity of the conditions can be ignored.
|
8)
|
In the case of condition precedent, the doctrine of cypres applies and the condition precedent is fulfilled if it is subsequently complied with.
|
The doctrine of cypress does not apply.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment