 |
| Freedom of Speech |
Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article 19(1)(a). It is a cornerstone of democracy, enabling individuals to express their opinions, share ideas, and participate in public discourse without fear of repression. However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2).
Constitutional Provisions:
Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression to all citizens.
Article 19(2): Allows the State to impose reasonable restrictions on this right in the interest of:
- Sovereignty and integrity of India
- Security of the State
- Friendly relations with foreign states
- Public order
- Decency or morality
- Contempt of court
- Defamation
- Incitement to an offence
Scope and Importance:
Freedom of Press: Though not explicitly mentioned, freedom of the press is derived from Article 19(1)(a). It includes the right to publish and disseminate information and opinions.
Right to Information: The Supreme Court in State of U.P. v. Raj Narain (1975) held that freedom of speech includes the right to know and access information.
Right to Criticize: Citizens have the right to criticize the government, policies, and public figures, provided it does not cross into defamation or incitement.
Landmark Judgments:
1. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950): The Supreme Court ruled that freedom of speech and expression is essential for democracy. Pre-censorship of publications was held unconstitutional.
2. Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India (1973): The Court recognized that the freedom of the press is part of freedom of speech and that governmental interference with press circulation violates Article 19(1)(a).
3. S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram (1989): The Court emphasized that freedom of speech cannot be suppressed unless the expression poses a clear and present danger.
4. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, ruling that it was unconstitutional as it violated the right to free speech. The judgment affirmed that vague and broad restrictions on free speech are unconstitutional.
Reasonable Restrictions:
While Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech, it is not absolute. The State can impose reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2), but such restrictions must satisfy the test of reasonableness.
Freedom of Speech vs. Hate Speech:
- The Court has distinguished between free speech and hate speech, ruling that hate speech, which incites violence or public disorder, is not protected under Article 19(1)(a).
- In Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India (2014), the Supreme Court called for specific legislation to regulate hate speech.
Contemporary Issues:
- Internet Shutdowns: The Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) ruled that internet access is a part of freedom of speech and expression and can only be restricted under exceptional circumstances.
- Social Media and Free Speech: With the rise of social media platforms, concerns around online censorship, fake news, and disinformation have increased, sparking debates on regulating speech without curbing freedoms.
Freedom of speech under the Indian Constitution is a fundamental right that empowers citizens to express their views and opinions. However, it is subject to reasonable restrictions to maintain public order, decency, and the sovereignty of the nation. Balancing free speech with responsible expression is essential to preserving democracy and preventing misuse of this right.